Montgomery County Energy Tax Hike - Update

April 30, 2010
If what I heard during and after a Montgomery County Council joint meeting yesterday is any indication, I have to warn businesses and property owners in the county to get ready to open your wallets a lot wider than you already do now. Unless something happens behind the scenes in the next month or so, the Council is going to hike your energy rates. Big time.

Thursday's joint workgroup meeting of council's Management & Fiscal Policy committee and Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy & Environment committee attracted quite a few concerned businesspeople, officials from various Chambers of Commerce, and even Pepco officials. They came to hear council's reaction to County Executive Ike Leggett's proposal to increase the energy tax by 100% on each electrical kilowatt and natural-gas therm burned for both residential and commercial account holders. Other forms of energy, like coal, propane and heating oil, are also covered by the increase.

If you think that number is scary, there's more: Leggett's proposal would really hurt commercial account holders, because they already pay almost three times more in energy taxes than do residential customers.

All of these actions are understandably sending mixed signals to the business community in Montgomery County, as well as to companies thinking about moving here or investing here. An article in the Gazette spotlights this confusion. It also quotes Electric Advisors President Russell Lacey as saying these new costs would just be passed onto consumers, and would make it tough for businesses to hire employees.

Meantime, the signals coming out of yesterday's committee meeting were just as cloudy. A lot of the discussion centered around making the tax split between commercial and residential more fair and even. Several ideas were suggested; nothing was nailed down.

It must be pointed out that yesterday's meeting was just a worksession involving two of the council's committees. No vote could be taken, since it wasn't a full session of the council. What's more, there's going to be another hearing on the hike in May before the council even votes on it. And I'm sure much more information will be generated, exchanged and discussed behind council's closed doors in the meantime.

But from what Council President Nancy Floreen told a small group of us after the meeting, the splits being considered would still hit the commercial sector hard. The figures she mentioned would really put the hurt on businesses and property owners here in Montgomery County.

There's so much detail I'd love to get into here; if I did, though, this post would be much, much longer -- and it's getting really long already, right?One big detail I'll point out, though, is if a big energy tax hike is passed, Montgomery County would hold the dubious honor of having the highest energy taxes in the DC/Baltimore metro region. By far.

Some people might say, "Hey, Bob, won't your company benefit from this new tax? After all, if you can lower a businesses' or property owner's rates, you can actually soften the blow of these new taxes."

I cannot deny that we'd have the potential to see more business in Montgomery County. I'll leave the specific reasons out of this discussion for now, because we're not sure what will come of council's further discussions and investigations.

But I'd really, really hate to see new business come our way as a result of an onerous tax. Don't get me wrong. We'll absolutely help commercial account holders hedge against a huge increase in energy taxes. What I'd much rather do is assist them in lowering their rates, so they can have more cash in their pockets. That money can buy a lot of items and services to help a company grow, hire more people, and then grow even more. That's how an economy thrives.

Here's an example of both scenarios at work. I'm currently negotiating electricity rates for an office condo building in the county that is master metered; in other words, only one electric meter serves all of the tenants in the building. The property itself uses about one million kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity per year.

The building's condo association currently pays Pepco 9.609 cents per kWh for electricity supply and transmission. I've quoted them pricing that's around 8.3 cents per kWh for a 2-year deal. With the building using 89,400 kWh of power (as shown on its March, 2010 statement), we would have lowered its power supply/transmission rate by 14%, or $1210, for that month. Pretty good, right?

Well, if the 100% Leggett-proposed rate hike were in place for that same billing period, the association's energy tax would be higher by $1265. The tax would have slightly more than canceled out our lower rate. Of course, the overall bill would still be lower, because of our negotiation. Yet the association would still be paying $1265 more in taxes.

If the tax would have been in place without our pricing? The association's original bill would have been even higher by that $1265 figure.

Meantime, here's another more-dramatic example, from the Gazette article:

Suburban Hospital in Bethesda spends about $342,000 annually on energy taxes, according to Leslie Ford Weber, senior vice president of government and community relations for the hospital. If the increase passes, the hospital will pay about $700,000.

If you are concerned about this new tax, and what it will do to county businesses, you can visit our "action" post of yesterday to find out how you can compute your own businesses' tax, and how you can "fight the power."
Next week, we'll look at the residential energy market. The actual dollar figures aren't nearly as dramatic, but there's no doubt that this new tax -- no matter what form it eventually takes -- will put the hurt on Montgomery County residents at home, too.
By Russell Lacey April 17, 2026
For most business owners in Washington, D.C. and Maryland, June 1st marks the unofficial start of summer: the return of rooftop happy hours, tourists swarming the National Mall, and the inevitable cranking of the HVAC system. But in the world of energy management, June 1st is something much more significant. It is the "Energy New Year." If you manage a commercial property, a non-profit, or a restaurant, this date represents the reset button for how your utility costs are calculated for the next twelve months. While many decision-makers focus solely on the "supply rate" on their bill, there is a hidden mechanism called the Peak Load Contribution (PLC) that could be quietly inflating your costs by thousands of dollars The good news? You aren’t powerless. By understanding how the grid works and taking a few strategic steps this spring, you can "beat the surge" and secure better financial predictability for your organization. The June 1st Milestone: Why It’s the "Energy New Year" In the Mid-Atlantic region: specifically within the territories served by utilities like Pepco and BGE: we operate under the PJM Interconnection . PJM is the regional transmission organization that coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity across 13 states and D.C. Every year on June 1st, PJM begins a new "delivery year." This is the date when the "Capacity Tags" (or PLC) assigned to every commercial building are updated based on the previous summer’s usage. Why does this matter to you? Because the capacity charge often makes up 25% to 40% of a commercial electricity bill. If your building was inefficient during the hottest days of last summer, you are about to pay the price for it starting this June. Conversely, what you do this summer will dictate your fixed costs for June 2027 through May 2028.  The Hidden Problem: Understanding Capacity Charges and Your PLC Most business owners look at their bill and see "Kilowatt-hours (kWh)": that’s how much energy you used. But the Capacity Charge is based on your "Peak Load Contribution." Think of it like a "reservation fee" for the grid. PJM needs to ensure there is enough power available if every single building turned on every single light and AC unit at the exact same moment. To fund this readiness, they charge businesses based on their highest usage during the grid's "Five Peak Hours" of the previous summer. The Problem: If your restaurant, condo building, or school had a massive spike in usage on a Tuesday afternoon in July when the grid was stressed, your PLC (or Capacity Tag) will be high. You will then be billed at that "peak" rate every single month for the following year, regardless of how little energy you use in the winter. For many commercial clients, this is a "ghost charge" that feels impossible to control. But with the right services , it becomes a manageable variable.
By Russell Lacey April 10, 2026
For business owners in Maryland, Washington, DC, and Virginia —right here in our backyard —energy costs are more than just a line item: they are a significant variable that can impact quarterly profitability and long-term operational planning. In recent years, the natural gas market has been characterized by notable volatility. From global supply chain disruptions to shifting domestic production levels, the price you pay for the blue flame in your furnace or the heat in your commercial kitchen has likely felt like a moving target. At Electric Advisors, Inc. , we believe that data-driven decision-making is the only way to effectively manage utility expenses. To help you understand where the market has been and where it is going, we have analyzed the historical procurement costs for Washington Gas (WGL) and compared them to the current opportunities available through competitive suppliers across Maryland, Washington, DC, and Virginia. The results are clear: across the WGL service territory in MD, DC, and VA , the cost of sticking with the utility’s default Purchased Gas Charge (PGC) may be significantly higher than many business owners realize. The Benchmark: Washington Gas Historical PGC Rates in Maryland, DC, and Virginia Every month, Washington Gas updates its Purchased Gas Charge (PGC) . This is the rate at which the utility passes through the cost of the natural gas it buys on the wholesale market to its customers. By law, the utility does not make a profit on the gas itself; they make their money on the delivery and infrastructure. However, the price they pay—and the price you eventually see on your bill—is subject to the fluctuations of the monthly wholesale market. For businesses in the broader WGL footprint, the important takeaway is this: Washington Gas default supply pricing and competitive market opportunities are consistent across its service territory in Maryland, Washington, DC, and Virginia. In other words, the same benchmark applies whether your business is in suburban Maryland, downtown DC, or Northern Virginia. Looking back at the last 24 months across the WGL service territory in MD, DC, and VA , we see a story of dramatic shifts: 24-Month Average WGL PGC: Approximately $0.68 per therm . The 2025 Spike: In April 2025, rates peaked at a staggering $0.8085 per therm . The 2026 Moderation: As of April 2026, the WGL rate has settled to $0.6382 per therm . While the 2026 rate is a welcome decrease from the highs of the previous year, it remains significantly higher than the rates seen a decade ago. For context, in 2010, the rate hovered around $0.32 per therm. We have seen a steady, long-term upward trend that necessitates a more proactive approach to commercial natural gas rates .
March 3, 2026
Helping Washington D.C. businesses take advantage of their sales tax exemption opportunities. Did you know that restaurants don't have to pay sales tax?